Opportunity Rank: Which Market Deserves Your Attention Today

Every other page on the platform tells you what is happening. Opportunity Rank tells you where to look first, why, and whether anything is worth doing at all.

That last part is the one most tools leave out.

The one distinction that matters

Opportunity Rank tells you what to trade. Your setup tells you when to trade. Your risk rules tell you how much to trade.

A high score means investigate this market. It does not mean enter this market. Nothing on the platform knows where your stop goes, what you are already holding, or what you are prepared to lose. The ranking narrows 46 markets down to the handful carrying real evidence, and then hands the decision back to you.

If you take one thing from this article, take that. A score of 91 is an instruction to look, not to click.

The simple version

Every fifteen minutes, each of the 46 markets is scored from 0 to 100 on how much evidence supports trading it, in a specific direction, right now. The board shows the top eight, best first.

Direction is decided before anything is scored. A factor cannot confirm or oppose until there is something to confirm or oppose, so the platform first resolves whether the case is long or short, using the higher timeframe alignment, the short timeframe stack, and the currency strength differential. If those cancel out exactly, the market is set aside rather than guessed at.

Then ten factors vote. Each one says confirm, oppose, or nothing useful, and each carries a weight:

The votes are weighted and blended into one number. Unanimous agreement approaches 100. A market where everything read produced nothing conclusive sits at 50.

How to read the score

Open any market on the board and it shows its working: what is supporting it, what is fighting it, and what was read but could not be called either way. That third category is deliberate. A factor that was checked and had nothing to say is genuine information, and it is different from a factor we could not read at all.

When it says nothing

Some sessions the board is empty, and it says so.

If the best market on the whole board scores below 60, the platform shows a plain statement that nothing is worth trading rather than a ranked list of mediocre candidates. That threshold is not decoration. It would be trivial to always show a top eight, and it would be worse than useless: a ranking that is never empty teaches you that there is always something to trade, which is the single most expensive belief in retail trading.

Three different situations produce an empty board, and the platform distinguishes them because they mean different things:

• Nothing clears the bar. The board was read and nothing on it is good enough. Sit out.
• Markets are closed. It is the weekend. Nothing to do.
• Awaiting data. We have not managed a recent reading. That is our problem, not a judgement about the market, and it never comes with advice about patience.

Markets that are removed entirely

Separately from scoring, a market can be pulled off the board altogether. The bar for that is "showing this would be irresponsible", not "this looks weak", because weak is what the score is for.

• High impact event. A major release is due for either currency inside the news window, or has just printed. Whatever the chart says, the next few minutes are a coin toss.
• Illiquid. The book is thin. A trend read off prices nobody is trading into can vanish on the next tick.
• No direction. The directional inputs cancelled exactly. There is no case to argue either way.

A removed market is not hidden from us. Every one is stored with its reason, so we can answer later whether the news block was earning its keep or quietly costing good trades.

Two things worth being straight about

Positioning is read contrarian. Crowded speculative positioning counts against a trade rather than for it, and it deliberately gets no vote on direction. If it did, the score would aim at the reversal instead of the trend. The convergence score makes the same exclusion for the same reason.

This is young. The scoring model is version 1, and every score the platform has ever produced is frozen with the full reasoning behind it: which factors voted, how strongly, and what happened next. That record is the point. It is what will eventually answer which factors deserve their weight and which are along for the ride, and until that question has been asked against data the model has never seen, the weights are a considered starting point rather than a proven one.

Price history on the platform begins in May 2026, so the honest retrospective window is a few months rather than years. We would rather tell you that than imply a track record that does not exist yet.

Using it in practice

Open the board at the start of your session. Read the top two or three. Open the reasoning on any that interest you and check what is fighting them, not just what is supporting them. Then go and look at the chart, and apply your own entry rules.

If the board is empty, close the app. That is the correct use of it, and on plenty of days it is the most profitable thing it will tell you.